Two major Senate committees have reached agreement on a cyber incident reporting mandate. And it looks like the big winner are the business lobbyists who got concessions from both committees. At least that’s my take. Dmitri Alperovitch says the bill may still be in trouble because of Justice Department opposition. And Tatyana Bolton not unfairly credits the Cyber Solarium Commission for incident reporting getting this close to passage.
Meanwhile, another piece of legislation, the Secure Equipment Act of 2021, has already been passed and signed by the President. It will lock a boatload of Chinese equipment out of U.S. markets. Dmitri explains why the FCC needed this additional authority.
If you’re surprised by the Kyle Rittenhouse trial, and the strength of the defense case, you can blame Facebook and Twitter, with astonishingly suppressed posts arguing that Rittenhouse had acted lawfully in self-defense. In a reverse John Adams moment, Twitter even suspended Rittenhouse’s defense counsel for defending him. And Facebook declared him guilty of a mass shooting and blocked searches for his name. If you want more content mob-eration like that in your podcast feed, well, no worries: the NYT is on it; the gray old lady is demanding to know why woke censorship hasn’t yet come to podcasts.
Mark unpacks yet another bipartisan tech regulation-cum-competition bill. This one aiming to reduce platforms’ ability to foist “opaque algorithms” on their users. Tatyana notes that a lot of the bills trying to improve portability and competition are likely to raise cybersecurity concerns.
Dmitri and I aren’t impressed by the hoax email sent out in the FBI’s name from a poorly designed FBI website. It’s one step up from defacing the FBI’s website. I argue the bureau ought to give the hacker a low four-figure bug bounty and call it a day, but Dmitri thinks the hacker will be on the FBI’s most wanted list for a while. I tend to agree; there is, after all, no greater crime than Embarrassing the Bureau.
In quick hits:
- Mark gives us a quick overview of the states’ recently updated antitrust complaint against Alphabet’s Google.
- Tatyana and Dmitri talk about the implications of the Commerce Department sending information requests to the world’s top chipmakers.
- Tatyana explains (as much as anyone can) Elon Musk’s decision to sell a bunch of Tesla stock because that’s what Elon Twitter wanted. We note that Elon promised to show his tweets to a lawyer in advance if they could move the market and wonder whether he actually found a lawyer who thought that tweet was a good idea.
- I do a quick victory lap for having suspected that Frances Haugen’s incoherent retreat from criticizing Facebook’s end-to-end encryption was forced on her by the Silicon Valley version of the Deep State. Thanks to Politico, we now know her European tour was run by a batch of lefty digerati who hate Facebook, but not as much as they hate the FBI.
- And I mourn the fact that this week the U.S. government finally surrendered to Microsoft and joined the Paris Call for Trust and Security in Cyberspace.
Download the 383rd Episode (mp3)
You can subscribe to The Cyberlaw Podcast using iTunes, Google Play, Spotify, Pocket Casts, or our RSS feed. As always, The Cyberlaw Podcast is open to feedback. Be sure to engage with @stewartbaker on Twitter. Send your questions, comments, and suggestions for topics or interviewees to CyberlawPodcast@steptoe.com. Remember: If your suggested guest appears on the show, we will send you a highly coveted Cyberlaw Podcast mug!
The views expressed in this podcast are those of the speakers and do not reflect the opinions of their institutions, clients, friends, families, or pets.